In robbery cases, or in any criminal case, the evidence is absolutely vital to building a solid defense. In fact, forensic evidence in Chantilly robbery cases can play an instrumental role in an individual’s case. Document-based evidence is not used by the defense in a robbery case, instead, it is often used by the prosecution. That is why it is important for charged individuals to work with a capable robbery attorney that challenge the prosecution’s use of forensic evidence.
Defense attorneys often leverage expert witnesses in order to interpret forensic evidence in Chantilly robbery cases. Experts could also help understand what the prosecution’s expert is saying. The experts are the ones who are going to be introducing forensic evidence, like fingerprints and DNA. Defense attorneys need to ask questions of the witnesses to prove that they did not take the proper steps in collecting this evidence or cheated. They may ask questions to try to show that there is a possibility that the evidence got tainted even before it got to the expert.
Experts would be used when looking at the forensic evidence based on what the forensic evidence says. For example, if a fingerprint is presented, and they are saying it is not, an expert looks at it and determines whether it is a match or not. They are going to testify to things like images and what they mean to this fingerprint and why it is much more common that people’s fingerprints are taken incorrectly or analyzed incorrectly when used in this particular situation. It depends on the facts of the case, but forensic experts are going to attack every aspect of whatever the other expert says.
Defense attorneys demonstrate potential inaccuracies in forensic evidence by presenting their own forensic expert to testify that this evidence does not mean what it purports to mean or that it was done incorrectly. Otherwise, for inaccuracies in a witness’ statement, they cross-examine them. For situations where they are presenting to the jury during closing arguments, they ask questions of the evidence presented. When they talk to a jury, they say, “This does not make sense. Ask yourself what this means.” They pose those questions to the jury to show that there is some type of inaccuracy.
One issue regarding eye-witness testimony and forensic evidence in Chantilly robbery cases like these is, that it is one of the most unreliable types of evidence that can be presented. People misremember things all the time. It has been scientifically proven that people do this and they can be led to remember certain things. These trials in these cases take longer, so by the time it goes to trial it might have been a year since the incident happened.
An individual does not have any independent recollection or if they do, it might come from preparation for trial. Eye-witness testimony, even right after the incident occurred, is tricky. People’s brains may potentially trick them. They might see things or think that they saw things that did not exist. Lawyers have to show that this eyewitness had an incorrect recollection, even if they say that they remember perfectly. Defense attorneys deal with these issues on cross-examination. They bring in other witnesses to contradict the eye-witness testimony. If an individual has been charged with a robbery offense, they should work with an adept attorney that could help them challenge forensic evidence and could build their case.